Fluoride removal a win for Gladstone's democracy

This article is an opinion and only represents the views of the author.

THE decision on fluoride removal from Gladstone's water supply should be commended even if not condoned by some constituents.

GLADSTONE DIVIDED ON FLUORIDE | 

AGAINST | 

>>'Mass medication': Scientist's plea to follow Gladstone

>>'Toxic chemical': Gladstone woman tells of 'agony' from fluoride

FOR |

>>Gladstone's 'anti-fluoridation cowboys' won with 'fear campaign': Opinion

Democracy and compulsory voting work quite well together and though seemingly a contradiction in terms they result in the fairness that elects a government or a council to make often contentious deliberations on our behalf.

Though not all Gladstone's councillors or ratepayers agreed on fluoride removal democracy ruled.

Flip the coin to the Federal Government's proposal to squander reportedly $160<TH>million odd for a plebiscite on same-sex marriage and duck shove the decision back to the voters who recently elected them - a shameless act of self-preservation by bigots scared to rock the ultra-conservative boat.

There are enough shiny seats occupied in both federal houses to surely reach consensus on same-sex marriage and accordingly pass an Act that which will become law at least until the next election.

Politicians are extremely well remunerated for the exalted profession they have chosen and should not require constant reminders that we elected them to make tricky decisions on our behalf. That's democracy.



Mobile van set to help vulnerable residents

premium_icon Mobile van set to help vulnerable residents

Funding announcement set to help restore dignity.

'Make a conscious effort': Push to shop local this Christmas

'Make a conscious effort': Push to shop local this Christmas

"Small businesses are the lifeblood of our communities.”

Xmas cheer for kids in care

premium_icon Xmas cheer for kids in care

The initiative set to bring cheer to foster kids.

Local Partners